Image scale calculator: arcseconds per pixel

Image scale is how much sky one pixel covers: 206.265 × pixel size in µm ÷ focal length in mm, in arcseconds per pixel. A 3.76 µm pixel at 400 mm covers 1.94″; at 2032 mm, 0.38″. The calculator also shows the effect of binning and compares the pixel with the aperture's Dawes and Rayleigh limits.

Published October 15, 2026 . Sources are listed at the end of the page.

Camera

Imaging area = pixel count × pixel size where both are published; otherwise the published sensor size.

Telescope or lens
Image scale (arcseconds per pixel)
1.29″
Effective focal length
600 mm
Same scale in arcminutes0.0215′ per pixel
Focal-plane scale20.6′ per millimetre of sensor
Aperture resolution limit1.45″ (Dawes), 1.73″ (Rayleigh, 550 nm)
Pixels across the Dawes limit1.12 px
With binning
BinningEffective pixelScale
1×13.76 µm1.29″
2×27.52 µm2.59″
3×311.28 µm3.88″
4×415.04 µm5.17″

The formula

A pixel of size p at the focal plane of a telescope with focal length f subtends an angle of p ÷ f radians, the plate-scale relation given in standard telescope optics course notes. One radian is 206,264.8 arcseconds (180 ÷ π × 3600). With the pixel size in micrometres and the focal length in millimetres, the unit conversion moves the decimal point three places:

image scale (″/px) = 206.265 × pixel size (µm) ÷ focal length (mm)

The approximation p ÷ f is excellent at this scale: across a single pixel, the angle is millions of times smaller than a radian, so the difference from the exact arctangent is far below anything a camera can measure.

Examples with real cameras and telescopes

Camera pixelTelescopeFocal lengthImage scale
3.76 µm (IMX571)William Optics Cat 51250 mm3.10″
3.76 µm (IMX571)Askar FRA400400 mm1.94″
3.76 µm (IMX571)Sky-Watcher Esprit 100EDX550 mm1.41″
3.76 µm (IMX533)Celestron C8 with f/6.3 reducer1280 mm0.61″
3.76 µm (IMX533)Celestron EdgeHD 82032 mm0.38″
2.9 µm (IMX585)Celestron EdgeHD 82032 mm0.29″
3.75 µm (ASI120MM Mini)120 mm guide scope120 mm6.45″

The same 3.76 µm pixel spans about eight times the angle through a 250 mm Petzval as through a 2032 mm SCT, which is about 66 times the area of sky. Whether either is a good match depends on the sky, not on the camera alone; the sampling calculator makes that comparison with your seeing.

Binning

Binning combines neighbouring pixels into one: 2×2 binning turns four 3.76 µm pixels into one 7.52 µm pixel, doubling the image scale. The calculator lists 1×1 to 4×4. On many CMOS cameras binning is done in software after readout, which keeps the image scale arithmetic the same while the noise behaviour differs from the hardware binning of CCDs; the gain and read noise guide covers that difference.

Reducers, Barlows and colour cameras

A reducer or Barlow changes the effective focal length, so the image scale changes by the inverse of the factor: a 0.8× reducer makes the arcseconds per pixel 25 % larger, so each pixel covers about 56 % more area of sky. Use the factor box, or pick an official reducer from the list when the telescope has one in our data.

For one-shot colour cameras the calculator reports the scale of the individual photosites. Each colour channel is sampled by only some of them (a Bayer filter places red, green and blue over different pixels), so the effective resolution per colour is coarser than the number suggests; the mono vs colour guide explains how much.

The aperture’s own limit

The calculator also shows the telescope’s resolution limit for its aperture: Dawes’ empirical limit, which Dawes gave in 1867 as 4.56″ divided by the aperture in inches (116 ÷ D in mm), and the Rayleigh criterion, 1.22 λ ÷ D, about 138 ÷ D(mm) at 550 nm. For an 80 mm refractor these are 1.45″ and 1.73″; for a 203 mm SCT, 0.57″ and 0.68″. On long-exposure deep-sky images the atmosphere usually blurs stars more than this, which is why seeing rather than aperture sets the useful image scale for most imagers. The resolution limits guide explains both criteria and where they come from.

Questions

What is a good image scale for deep-sky imaging?
It depends on your seeing. Compare the image scale with the size of your stars (FWHM) using the sampling calculator; common guidance aims for two to three pixels across the FWHM.
Where does 206.265 come from?
One radian is 206,264.8 arcseconds. Pixel size is in micrometres and focal length in millimetres, so the factor of 1000 between them turns 206,265 into 206.265.
Does binning change the image scale?
Yes. Binning 2×2 combines four pixels into one, doubling the effective pixel size and so doubling the arcseconds per pixel.

Sources

  1. PHY217 Telescope optics: basic principles (plate scale) University of Sheffield, V. Dhillon (course notes). Plate scale 206265 / F arcsec per mm; Rayleigh criterion. Accessed October 12, 2026.
  2. AAVSO Guide to CCD/CMOS Photometry with Monochrome Cameras, v1.0 American Association of Variable Star Observers. Sect. 3.2.2, image scale per pixel with the 206.265 factor. Accessed October 12, 2026.
  3. Catalogue of micrometrical measurements of double stars (introduction) W. R. Dawes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 27, 217 (1867). 4.56 arcsec divided by aperture in inches; 116/D(mm) is the metric conversion. Accessed October 12, 2026.