What fits in your frame?
Pick a target, a camera and a telescope. The chart draws your sensor over the object at true scale, north up, the way a star atlas would.
Behind it are 9 calculators for field of view, image scale, sampling and exposure, specifications for 78 astronomy cameras and 119 telescopes taken from the manufacturers' pages, and catalogue sizes for 65 deep-sky objects.
Where the numbers come from
- Camera and telescope specifications are read from the makers' own product pages and manuals. Missing values are shown as "not published", never estimated.
- Object sizes and positions come from SIMBAD, the SEDS Messier catalogue and catalogues hosted on VizieR. Where catalogues disagree, the target pages list every value.
- Formulas cite their origin, from the IAU FITS Standard to Frédéric Michaud's NPF rule, and the calculation code is covered by automated tests.
Calculators
Every calculator shows its formula and its sources. The camera and telescope lists are filled from manufacturer specifications, and you can type your own values instead.
-
Field of view
Field of view of any camera on any telescope or lens, from sensor size and focal length, using the exact arctan formula. With presets from maker specs.
-
Target framing
Check whether a galaxy or nebula fits your sensor, with catalogue sizes and position angles, a star-chart preview and the focal length for a chosen fill.
-
Mosaic planner
Count mosaic panels for a nebula or galaxy from your sensor, focal length and overlap, with both camera orientations tried and a panel layout chart.
-
Image scale
Arcseconds per pixel from pixel size and focal length (206.265 × µm ÷ mm), with binning, reducer factors and the telescope's resolution limit.
-
Sampling and seeing
Pixels across the star FWHM for your camera, telescope and seeing, with under- and over-sampling verdicts, binning options and the published rules of thumb.
-
Reducer and Barlow
Effective focal length, focal ratio, image scale and field with a reducer or Barlow, from its nominal factor or from lens focal length and spacing.
-
Untracked exposure (NPF)
Longest untracked exposure before stars trail, by the 500 rule and by Michaud's NPF rule (simplified and complete), with trail length in pixels.
-
Eyepiece
Magnification, exit pupil and true field for any telescope and eyepiece, from apparent field or field stop, with Barlow and your own pupil size.
-
Session storage
How many gigabytes a night of imaging produces: FITS frame size from resolution and bit depth, calibration frames, and 32-bit processing copies.
Targets
Framing guides for well-known objects: catalogue size and where it comes from, when the object is highest, and how it fills six common camera and telescope combinations.
-
Andromeda Galaxy (M31)
M31 spans about 3° × 1° in the SEDS catalogue. Which focal lengths fit it on APS-C, full-frame and 1-inch sensors, and how to rotate the camera.
-
Eagle Nebula (M16)
SEDS lists M16 at 7′, but that is the star cluster. The nebula spans over 30′. Focal lengths for the whole Eagle and for the Pillars region.
-
Heart and Soul Nebulae
IC 1805 and IC 1848 are 149′ apart in Cassiopeia. Their sizes differ by catalogue from 60′ to 150′; focal lengths and mosaics for the pair and each nebula.
-
Lagoon and Trifid (M8, M20)
M8 and M20 are 85.8′ apart in Sagittarius. Focal lengths that hold both, the catalogue sizes behind the numbers, and why latitude matters for this pair.
-
Leo Triplet
The three Leo Triplet galaxies span about 41′ × 24′ in catalogue outlines. Focal lengths that hold all three, and why catalogue sizes for M65 differ twofold.
-
M81 and M82
M81 and M82 are 36.9′ apart, almost north–south. The focal lengths that fit both on APS-C, full-frame and square sensors, and why portrait helps.
-
North America and Pelican
NGC 7000 and IC 5070 are 83.5′ apart and together span about 181′ × 120′. Focal lengths for the pair, sizes from three catalogues, and mosaic options.
-
Orion Nebula (M42)
M42 measures 85′ × 60′ in the SEDS table and 66′ × 60′ in its text. Focal lengths for APS-C and full frame, M43 next door, and the bright Trapezium.
-
Pinwheel Galaxy (M101)
M101 is a face-on spiral of 22′ (SEDS) to 26.9′ (NGC 2000.0). Which focal lengths frame it, and why its best month differs from its midnight date.
-
Pleiades (M45)
The SEDS catalogue gives the Pleiades 110′. Which focal lengths frame the cluster on APS-C and full frame, and why the dust around it needs extra room.
-
Rosette Nebula
The Rosette spans 100′ in the Sharpless catalogue, with the cluster NGC 2244 at its centre. Focal lengths for APS-C, full frame and square sensors.
-
Triangulum Galaxy (M33)
M33 measures 73′ × 45′ in the SEDS catalogue but only 60′ × 36′ in SIMBAD. What that means for focal length, and when NGC 604 needs a longer lens.
-
Veil Nebula (Cygnus Loop)
The Cygnus Loop spans 230′ × 160′ in SIMBAD; its bright arcs NGC 6960 and NGC 6992 are 150′ apart. Focal lengths for the whole loop and for each arc.
-
Whirlpool Galaxy (M51)
M51 is only 11′ × 7′. How much focal length it needs on common sensors, why sampling sets the real limit, and where NGC 5195 sits.
Cameras
Published sensor specifications by maker and by sensor, with the field of view each camera gives at common focal lengths.
-
DSLR and mirrorless sensors
Eighteen Canon, Nikon, Sony and Fujifilm bodies compared by sensor size and image size, with derived pixel pitch, crop factor and fields from 14 to 300 mm.
-
Guide cameras
Twelve guide and small-sensor cameras at 120–600 mm: guide image scale against the main camera's, how much sky each sees, and when PHD2 suggests binning.
-
IMX455 full-frame cameras
Seven IMX455 full-frame cameras: the 43.3 mm image circle the sensor needs, 122 MB per 16-bit FITS frame, and how the ZWO, QHY, Player One and ToupTek bodies differ.
-
IMX533 square cameras
Ten IMX533 cameras with an 11.31 mm square frame: why a square suits round targets, how orientation stops mattering, and where QHY's 3008 × 3028 figure differs.
-
IMX571 APS-C cameras
Eleven cameras on Sony's IMX571: the same 3.76 µm pixels and near-identical fields, with differences in published cooling, back focus, full well and read noise.
-
IMX585 cameras
Eight IMX585 cameras from ZWO, QHY, Player One and ToupTek: cooled and uncooled twins, two published pixel arrays, and 2.9 µm sampling at long focal lengths.
-
Player One cameras
Player One's Poseidon, Ares, Zeus, Uranus, Saturn, Neptune, Mars, Ceres and Apollo cameras mapped to their Sony sensors, with cooled and uncooled twins compared.
-
QHY5III cameras
QHYCCD's uncooled QHY5III line from 1.45 µm to 5.86 µm pixels: the focal ratio each pixel size needs, back focus with and without the adapter, and spec conflicts.
-
QHYCCD cooled cameras
QHY's cooled cameras from the QHY183 to the QHY600, with sensor sizes computed from pixels × pitch, effective vs total pixel areas, and two discontinued models.
-
ToupTek astro cameras
ToupTek's ATR, SkyEye, G3M and GP astronomy cameras decoded, with the resolutions ToupTek publishes for shared Sony sensors and where its own pages disagree.
-
ZWO cooled cameras
ZWO's cooled ASI cameras grouped by sensor size, from the 1/1.2-inch ASI585MC Pro to the medium-format ASI461MM Pro, with computed fields and focal lengths.
-
ZWO planetary and guide cameras
ZWO's uncooled ASI cameras compared by pixel size and field: 1.45 µm to 5.86 µm pixels, image scale at long focal lengths, and the Mini guide cameras.
Telescopes
Aperture, focal length, image circle and official reducers, family by family, with fields of view for common sensors.
-
Askar APO, F and N series
Askar APO triplets (700–1421 mm), self-flattened F refractors and f/3.6 N Newtonians: reducer focal lengths, a 28 mm image circle, and which sensors fit.
-
Askar SQA, FRA and PHQ
Askar SQA, FRA and PHQ astrographs: how the three lines differ, 0.7x–0.76x reducers with published focal lengths, and back focus measured from different threads.
-
Celestron RASA astrographs
Celestron RASA astrographs at f/2–f/2.2: published image circles vs sensor diagonals, camera body and back focus limits at prime focus, and how filters fit.
-
Celestron SCT and EdgeHD
Celestron classic SCTs vs EdgeHD: the f/6.3 reducer vs 0.7x EdgeHD lenses, the 133.35/146.05 mm back focus, and why the manual's focal lengths differ.
-
Sharpstar astrographs
Sharpstar f/2.8 HNT Newtonians, SCA260 and SCA310 Cassegrains and the Z4 refractor: image circles, obstruction, and which EDPH models are discontinued.
-
Sky-Watcher Esprit triplets
Esprit ED and EDX triplets from 400 to 1050 mm: which flattener came in the box, the 0.77x reducers for the 120 and 150, and the 70EDX's 490 vs 455 mm focal length.
-
Sky-Watcher Evostar ED doublets
Sky-Watcher ED doublets: discontinued Evostar ED vs current EDX, matched reducers, published reduced focal lengths and the 0.92x vs 1.0x flattener conflict.
-
Sky-Watcher imaging Newtonians
Sky-Watcher PDS (f/5) and Quattro (f/4) imaging Newtonians: coma correctors that keep focal length, the Quattro 150P's 518 mm reducer and published secondary sizes.
-
Sky-Watcher Maksutovs and Dobsonians
Skymax Maksutovs (1300–2700 mm) and Classic/Flextube Dobsonians: exit pupil and magnification limits, planet image scale, and the Skymax 127 spec conflict.
-
Small refractors under 400 mm
Sixteen small refractors from 178 to 408 mm compared on APS-C field, image scale, focal ratio and image circle against APS-C and full-frame diagonals.
-
William Optics Cat refractors
William Optics' Cat Petzval astrographs: the RedCat to Cat WIFD rename, MiniCat, Mighty-Cat and Ultra-Cat, image circles, and the 55 ± 3 mm spacing WO recommends.
-
WO Zenithstar, GT, Pleiades, FluoroStar
William Optics doublets, triplets and Pleiades astrographs: flatteners published only as factors, computed focal lengths, per-scope back focus, FluoroStar 156.
Guides
Where the formulas come from and when the rules of thumb stop working.
-
Back focus and spacing
What back focus is, why reducers and flatteners need an exact sensor distance, published values for real telescopes, and how to add up a spacer chain.
-
Bortle scale
John Bortle's nine sky classes from 2001 with their naked-eye limiting magnitudes, where the published copies disagree, and how sky brightness enters imaging plans.
-
Calibration frames
What bias, dark, flat and dark-flat frames record, why only (L − D) ÷ (F − O) removes vignetting and dust, what must match, and the disk space a library takes.
-
Drizzle and dithering
What drizzle integration does, why it needs dithered and undersampled frames, which camera and telescope pairs qualify, and what it costs in noise and disk space.
-
Exit pupil and magnification
Magnification, exit pupil and true field formulas, why 50× per inch and the 7 mm pupil are conventions, and how the dark-adapted pupil shrinks with age.
-
Field of view formula
The geometry behind 2·arctan(d/2f), how large the small-angle error gets, why imaging area is pixels × pitch, and why crop factor is a framing convention.
-
Gain, read noise and bit depth
How ADC bit depth, full well and system gain in e-/ADU decide where a CMOS astro camera saturates, what unity gain is, and how binning affects read noise.
-
Guiding math
How guide-camera image scale compares with your imaging scale, what PHD2's documentation says about arcseconds and RMS, sub-pixel centroids, and the 1:4 rule.
-
Image scale explained
What arcseconds per pixel mean physically, how 206.265 falls out of s = Fθ and the radian, and how pixel size, focal length, binning and Bayer filters change it.
-
Integration time and S/N
The CCD equation behind exposure planning: why S/N grows with the square root of total time, when read noise makes sub length matter, and what it costs in storage.
-
Mono vs color cameras
How a Bayer color filter array splits the pixels, what that does to the image scale of each color, and what a mono camera with filters changes.
-
Narrowband filters and fast optics
Emission-line wavelengths from NIST, why steep light cones shift filter passbands to the blue, and which f/2–f/4 telescopes in our data are fast enough to matter.
-
NPF rule vs 500 rule
Where the 500 rule came from, how Frédéric Michaud's NPF rule adds f-number, pixel pitch and declination, and how the two compare on real camera bodies.
-
Reducers, Barlows and spacing
Thin-lens formulas for reducers (R = 1 − d/f) and Barlows (M = 1 + d/|f|), why spacing changes the factor, designed back focus, and what a faster f-ratio buys.
-
Resolution limits
Dawes' 4.56″ rule and the Rayleigh criterion 1.22 λ/D, worked for real apertures, and why atmospheric seeing sets the limit for long exposures.
-
Sampling and seeing
Why imagers put two to three pixels across a star's FWHM, how AAVSO, Diffraction Limited, Stan Moore, Atik and a PASA paper disagree, and what seeing to expect.